Saturday, June 8, 2019
Synoptic Gospels Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words
Synoptic Gospels - Essay ExampleSynoptic problem8 7. Faith seeking down the stairsstanding9 8. Conclusion..10 9. Bibliography..11 Introduction The prototypical three books in the New Testament (Mathew, arrest , and Luke) are referred to as synoptic gospels. These books talk about similar subjects and stories concerning delivery boy Christ. However, these books do not spinal column the events about savior Christ in the same length and detail. The books cover the events surrounding the life of Jesus Christ in the same sequence, and in nigh cases, have used similar words1. Relationship between the Synoptic Gospels The book of Mathew was written about 6 years after the ascension of Jesus Christ. This is agree to the chronology of gospels that are found in the crucial dates in the lives of Mary and her son, Jesus Christ. The book of Mark followed after the writing of the gospel according to St. Mathew. It was written about 16 years after the ascension of Jesus Christ. The gospel according to St. Luke was written 27 years after the ascension of Jesus Christ while John wrote about 62 years after the ascension2. ... It is important to note that the synoptic gospels have difference and similarities. The similarities cannot be explained precisely in terms of event sequences. These books differ in terms of language, grammar, and expression3. The first similarity among the synoptic is seen in their chronology. After Mathews gospel had been written and astray read by opposite Christians, the gospel according to Mark was written. It is assumed that Mark wrote the gospel after reading the work of Mathew. This is due to the fact that Mark could read Hebrew, the language that Mathew used in writing his gospel. The main difference between the three gospels is seen in respect of languages used by the two gospel writers were using. Mark was using Latin to write the gospel after reading the Hebrew version of Mathew4. After Mark and Mathew had written their gospels, Luk e wrote his gospel. The writing of the gospel according to Luke is assumed to have been influenced by the writings of Mark and Mathew since their gospels had been circulated widely. However, Luke could not interpreted Hebrew language in which Mathews gospel was written. The fuss in understanding Hebrew explains why Lukes gospel is more similar to that of Mark that Mathew. Johns gospel does not fall under the synoptic gospels because the book was written several years after the synoptic gospels had been written and were in wide circulation. The synoptic had already been translated into other languages when John decided to write the gospel. The difference between the synoptic and Johns gospel is in respect of the fact that John did not extremity to repeat the same events that had been narrated. John knew that his gospel was directed toward the whole church unlike the synoptic that were directed to specific audiences. The
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.